RetroSearch Browse

Sun Aug 2 12:53:09 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-August/090942.html

Jacob Rus wrote:
> Jacob Rus wrote:
>   
>> Brett Cannon wrote:
>>     
>>> Jacob Rus wrote:
>>>       
>>>> At the very least, I
>>>> think some changes can be made to this code without altering its basic
>>>> function, which would clean up the actual mime types it returns,
>>>> comment the exceptions to Apache and explain why they're there, and
>>>> make the code flow understandable to someone reading the code.
>>>>         
>>> That all sounds reasonable.
>>>       
>> Okay, as a start, I did a simple code cleanup that I think fixes some
>> potential bugs (any code using its own instance of the MimeTypes class
>> should now be insulated from other same-process users of the module),
>> chops out 80 or 90 lines, removes some redundant code paths, clarifies
>> some of the micro level behavior of some chunks of code, adds a bit
>> more to the docstring at the top of the file, and makes the program
>> flow somewhat clearer … *without* changing the semantics of the module
>> or its included list of MIME types.
>>     
>
> Here is a somewhat more substantively changed version. This one does
> away with the 'inited' flag and the 'init' function, which might be
> impossible given that their documented (though I would be extremely
> surprised if anyone calls them in third-party code), and makes the
> behavior of the code much clearer, I think, by making it very obvious
> how the singleton instance is actually working.
>
> Additionally, this version brings the lazy loading of Apache
> mime.types files to every MimeTypes instance, and makes the
> read_mime_types() function behave as expected (only getting the
> mapping from an apache mime.types file rather than including some
> extra types as the current code does).
>
> In this version, tests would want to call the _init_singleton()
> function to reset to defaults.
>
> http://pastie.textmate.org/568399
> http://pastie.textmate.org/568400
>
> To reiterate: this should still behave identically to the current
> module in all reasonable conditions. I still haven't made any changes
> to the set of MIME types included in the file, or the behavior of the
> module. Some such changes should be made as well, but the changes so
> far should be relatively uncontroversial, I hope.
>   

Please post the patches to the Python bug tracker:

    http://bugs.python.org

Thanks

Michael Foord

> Cheers,
> Jacob Rus
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
>   

-- 
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-August/090942.html below:

[Python-Dev] standard library mimetypes module pathologically broken?