On Apr 30, 2009, at 5:42 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > I think you are right. I have now excluded ASCII bytes from being > mapped, effectively not supporting any encodings that are not ASCII > compatible. Does that sound ok? Yes. The practical upshot of this is that users who brokenly use "ja_JP.SJIS" as their locale (which, note, first requires editing some files in /var/lib/locales manually to enable its use..) may still have python not work with invalid-in-shift-jis filenames. Since that locale is widely recognized as a bad idea to use, and is not supported by any distros, it certainly doesn't bother me that it isn't 100% supported in python. It seems like the most common reason why people want to use SJIS is to make old pre-unicode apps work right in WINE -- in which case it doesn't actually affect unix python at all. I'd personally be fine with python just declaring that the filesystem- encoding will *always* be utf-8b and ignore the locale...but I expect some other people might complain about that. Of course, application authors can decide to do that themselves by calling sys.setfilesystemencoding('utf-8b') at the start of their program. James
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4