> Thanks for clarifying the Windows behavior, here. A little more > clarification in the PEP could have avoided lots of discussion. It > would seem that a PEP, proposed to modify a poorly documented (and > therefore likely poorly understood) area, should be educational about > the status quo, as well as presenting the suggested change. Or is it > the Python philosophy that the PEPs should be as incomprehensible as > possible, to generate large discussions? Certainly not. See PEP 277 for a description of a specification of how file names are handled on Windows. Large discussions could be reduced if readers would try to constructively comment on the PEP, rather than making counter-proposals, or making statements about the PEP without making their implied assumptions explicit. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4