On 29Apr2009 17:03, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > Thomas Breuel wrote: >> Sure. However, that requires you to provide meaningful, reproducible >> counter-examples, rather than a stenographic formulation that might >> hint some problem you apparently see (which I believe is just not >> there). >> >> Well, here's another one: PEP 383 would disallow UTF-8 encodings of >> half surrogates. > > By my reading, the current Unicode 5.1 definition of 'UTF-8' disallows that. 5.0 also disallows it. No surprise I guess. -- Cameron Simpson <cs at zip.com.au> DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ Out on the road, feeling the breeze, passing the cars. - Bob Seger
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4