Thomas Breuel wrote: > > Sure. However, that requires you to provide meaningful, reproducible > counter-examples, rather than a stenographic formulation that might > hint some problem you apparently see (which I believe is just not > there). > > > Well, here's another one: PEP 383 would disallow UTF-8 encodings of half > surrogates. By my reading, the current Unicode 5.1 definition of 'UTF-8' disallows that. > But such encodings are currently supported by Python, and > they are used as part of CESU-8 coding. That's, in fact, a common way > of converting UTF-16 to UTF-8. How are you going to deal with existing > code that relies on being able to code half surrogates as UTF-8?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4