RetroSearch Browse

Tue Apr 28 14:03:42 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-April/089122.html

Paul Moore wrote:
> 2009/4/28 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>:
>   
>> Paul Moore <p.f.moore <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>     
>>> I've yet to hear anyone claim that they would have an actual problem
>>> with a specific piece of code they have written.
>>>       
>> Yep, that's the problem. Lots of theoretical problems noone has ever encountered
>> brought up against a PEP which resolves some actual problems people encounter on
>> a regular basis.
>>
>> For the record, I'm +1 on the PEP being accepted and implemented as soon as
>> possible (preferably before 3.1).
>>     
>
> In case it's not clear, I am also +1 on the PEP as it stands.
>   

Me 2

Michael
> Paul.
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
>   


-- 
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-April/089122.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 383: Non-decodable Bytes in System Character Interfaces