RetroSearch Browse

Mon Apr 27 20:28:40 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-April/089076.html

-On [20090414 16:43], Antoine Pitrou (solipsis at pitrou.net) wrote:
>If you have some time on your hands, you could try benchmarking it against
>Python 3.1's (py3k) decoder. There are two cases to consider:

Bjoern actually did it himself already:

http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de/utf-8/decoder/dfa/#performance

(results are Large, Medium, Tiny)

PyUnicode_DecodeUTF8Stateful (3.1a2), Visual C++ 7.1 -Ox -Ot -G7
4523ms 	5686ms 	3138ms

Manually inlined transcoder (see above), Visual C++ 7.1 -Ox -Ot -G7
4277ms 	4998ms 	4640ms

So on medium and large datasets the decoder of Bjoern is very interesting,
but the tiny case (just Bjoern's name) is quite a tad bit slower. The other
cases seems more typical of what the average use in Python would be.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B
Nobilitas sola est atque unica virtus...

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-April/089076.html below:

[Python-Dev] UTF-8 Decoder