Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen <at> xemacs.org> writes: > > Excuse me, but I can't see a scheme that encodes bytes as Unicodes but > only sometimes as a "clean separation". Yet it is. Filenames are all unicode, without exception, and there's no implicit conversion to bytes. That's a clean separation. > So what you'll get here, AFAICS, is a new situation where many > Windows-centric programmers will produce code that's incapable of > dealing with non-Unicode input because they don't have to care about > the distinction between Unicode and bytes. I don't understand what you're saying. py3k filenames are all unicode, even on POSIX systems, so where is the problem with/for Windows programmers?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4