Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 08:06:56 pm Mark Dickinson wrote: > >> I'd like to propose two minor changes to float and complex >> formatting, for 3.1. I don't think either change should prove >> particularly disruptive. >> >> (1) Currently, '%f' formatting automatically changes to '%g' >> formatting for numbers larger than 1e50. >> > ... > >> I propose removing this feature for 3.1 >> > > No objections from me. +1 > > >> I propose changing the complex str and repr to behave like the >> float version. That is, repr(4. + 10.j) should be "(4.0 + 10.0j)" >> rather than "(4+10j)". >> > > No objections here either. +0 > > > > Doing it sooner rather than later means that it is less likely to disrupt anyone relying on the representation (i.e. doctests). Michael -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4