> Because the encoding is not reliably reversible. Why do you say that? The encoding is completely reversible (unless we disagree on what "reversible" means). > I'm +1 on the concept, -1 on the PEP, due solely to the lack of a > reversible encoding. Then please provide an example for a setup where it is not reversible. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4