> The installer still leaves PATH alone by default, doesn't it? Correct. However, people frequently set the path "by hand", so they would probably appreciate a python3 binary (and pythonw3? python3w?). Of course, those people could also manually copy/rename the executable. > Although I guess choosing a file association for .py files becomes > rather more interesting... Indeed. We could register a py3 extension (and py3w? pyw3?), but then .py might remain associated with python3, even though people want it associated with python 2. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4