Greg Ewing wrote: > Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> it should be obvious in the same way that string concatenation is >> different from numerical addition: >> >> 1 + 2 = 2 + 1 >> '1' + '2' != '2' + '1' > > However, the proposed arithmetic isn't just non- > commutative, it's non-associative, which is a > much rarer and more surprising thing. We do > at least have > > ('1' + '2') + '3' == '1' + ('2' + '3') > But we don't have: (1e40 + -1e40) + 1 == 1e40 + (-1e40 + 1) Non-associativity is what makes for floating point headaches. To my knowledge, floating point is at least commutative. --Scott David Daniels Scott.Daniels at Acm.Org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4