Paul Moore <p.f.moore <at> gmail.com> writes: > > Oh, certainly! But in the absence of "intuitive", I've found in the > past that "standardised" is often better than nothing (For > example, I use Oracle's add_months function fairly often - it's not > perfect, and not always intuitive, but at least it's well-defined in > the corner cases, and fine for "normal" use). I think something like "date.add_months()" would be better than the proposed monthdelta. The monthdelta proposal suggests that addition is something well-defined and rigourous, which is not really the case here (for example, if you add a monthdelta and then substract it again, I'm not sure you always get back the original date). Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4