RetroSearch Browse

Thu Apr 16 10:10:36 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-April/088796.html

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:18:01AM -0500, Jess Austin wrote:
> I'm new to python core development, and I've been advised to write to
> python-dev concerning a feature/patch I've placed at
> http://bugs.python.org/issue5434, with Rietveld at
> http://codereview.appspot.com/25079.

   I have read the python code and it looks good. I often have a need to do
month-based calculations.

> This patch adds a "monthdelta" class and a "monthmod" function to the
> datetime module.  The monthdelta class is much like the existing
> timedelta class, except that it represents months offset from a date,
> rather than an exact period offset from a date.

   I'd rather see the code merged with timedelta: timedelta(months=n).

Oleg.
-- 
     Oleg Broytmann            http://phd.pp.ru/            phd at phd.pp.ru
           Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-April/088796.html below:

[Python-Dev] Issue5434: datetime.monthdelta