RetroSearch Browse

Tue Apr 14 20:30:34 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-April/088754.html

I rather like supporting short float representation. Given that CPython is
adopting it, I'm sure Jython will adopt this approach too as part of a
future Jython 3.x release.
- Jim

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk>wrote:

> Mark Dickinson wrote:
>
>> [snip...]
>>  Discussion points
>> =================
>>
>> (1) Any objections to including this into py3k?  If there's
>> controversy, then I guess we'll need a PEP.
>>
>>
>
> Big +1
>
>> (2) Should other Python implementations (Jython,
>> IronPython, etc.) be expected to use short float repr, or should
>> it just be considered an implementation detail of CPython?
>> I propose the latter, except that all implementations should
>> be required to satisfy eval(repr(x)) == x for finite floats x.
>>
>>
> Short float repr should be an implementation detail, so long as
> eval(repr(x)) == x still holds.
>
> Michael Foord
>
> --
> http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
> http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jbaker%40zyasoft.com
>

-- 
Jim Baker
jbaker at zyasoft.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090414/3928d6d4/attachment.htm>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-April/088754.html below:

[Python-Dev] Shorter float repr in Python 3.1?