Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-April/088747.html below:

[Python-Dev] Shorter float repr in Python 3.1?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Shorter float repr in Python 3.1?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Shorter float repr in Python 3.1?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <loom.20090414T161327-708 at post.gmane.org>,
 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> Has anyone tested a recent py3k using universal builds? Do all tests pass?

It's done all the time.  All of the current released installers (2.5, 
2.6, 3.0) are 2-way (i386, ppc) universal and we occasionally test all 
of the current lines (2.6, trunk, 3.0, 3.1) as 4-way (i386, ppc, x86_64, 
ppc64), although the ppc64 has had no testing recently.

-- 
 Ned Deily,
 nad at acm.org

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Shorter float repr in Python 3.1?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Shorter float repr in Python 3.1?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4