On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 7:13 AM, John Barham <jbarham at gmail.com> wrote: > If you play around a bit it becomes clear that what set.pop() returns > is independent of the insertion order: It might look like that, but I don't think this is true in general (at least, with the current implementation): >>> foo = set([1, 65537]) >>> foo.pop() 1 >>> foo = set([65537, 1]) >>> foo.pop() 65537 Mark
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4