On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Michele Simionato <michele.simionato at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: >> >> This probably should have gone to the python-ideas list. In any case, I >> think it needs to start with a clear offer from Michele (directly or relayed >> by you) to contribute it to the PSF with the usual conditions. > > I have no problem to contribute the module to the PSF and to maintain it. > I would just prefer to have the ability to change the function signature in > the core language rather than include in the standard library a clever hack. Flipping Michele's commit bit (if he wants it) is overdue. A quick google doesn't show he refused it in the past, but the same search shows the things things he did do - including the explication of MRO in 2.3 (http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.3/mro/). Plus he's a softie for decorators, as am I. -Jack
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4