Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-April/088453.html below:

[Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

David Cournapeau wrote:
> Having a full
> fledged language for complex builds is nice, I think most familiar
> with complex makefiles would agree with this.

Yes, people will still need general computation in their
build process from time to time whether the build tool
they're using supports it or not. And if it doesn't,
they'll resort to some ungodly mash such as Makefile+
shell+m4. Python has got to be a better choice than that.

-- 
Greg

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4