Daniel Fetchinson wrote: > The decorator module [1] written by Michele Simionato is a very useful > tool for maintaining function signatures while applying a decorator. > Many different projects implement their own versions of the same > functionality, for example turbogears has its own utility for this, I > guess others do something similar too. > > Was the issue whether to include this module in the stdlib raised? If > yes, what were the arguments against it? If not, what do you folks > think, shouldn't it be included? I certainly think it should be. > > Originally I sent this message to c.l.p [2] and Michele suggested it > be brought up on python-dev. He also pointed out that a PEP [3] is > already written about this topic and it is in draft form. > > What do you guys think, wouldn't this be a useful addition to functools? > [1] http://pypi.python.org/pypi/decorator > [2] http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/d4056023f1150fe0 > [3] http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0362/ This probably should have gone to the python-ideas list. In any case, I think it needs to start with a clear offer from Michele (directly or relayed by you) to contribute it to the PSF with the usual conditions.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4