On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Jesse Noller wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:33 PM, M.-A. Lemburg <mal at egenix.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 2009-04-02 17:32, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>>> >>>> I propose the following PEP for inclusion to Python 3.1. >>> >>> Thanks for picking this up. >>> >>> I'd like to extend the proposal to Python 2.7 and later. >>> >> >> -1 to adding it to the 2.x series. There was much discussion around >> adding features to 2.x *and* 3.0, and the consensus seemed to *not* >> add new features to 2.x and use those new features as carrots to help >> lead people into 3.0. > > Actually, isn't the policy just that nothing can go into 2.7 that isn't > backported from 3.1? Whether the actual backport happens or not is up to > the developer though. OTOH, we talked about a lot of things and my > recollection is probably fuzzy. > > Barry That *is* the official policy, but there was discussions around no further backporting of features from 3.1 into 2.x, therefore providing more of an upgrade incentive
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4