RetroSearch Browse

Mon Apr 6 08:03:18 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-April/088320.html

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 04:27,  <skip at pobox.com> wrote:
> Maybe once for each currently active Subversion branch (2.6, 2.7, 3.0, 3.1)?

Sure, if we're doing cloned branches. But then someone will also need
to clone 2.5, and maybe 2.4. The point is, as long as it's a constant
factor and not an order of magnitude more, it's still quite easy to
cope with.

This would also be one of the arguments *for* named branches, I suppose.

Cheers,

Dirkjan

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-April/088320.html below:

[Python-Dev] Mercurial?