Alexandre Vassalotti <alexandre <at> peadrop.com> writes: > > I am not sure if this is a good idea. Currently, the argument of > peek() is documented as a lower bound that cannot exceed the size of > the buffer: Unfortunately, in practice, the argument is neither a lower bound nor an upper bound. It's just used as some kind of internal heuristic (in the Python version) or not used at all (in the C version). Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4