On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote: > Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> >> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >>> >>> C. Titus Brown wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I vote for a separate mailing list -- 'python-tests'? -- but I don't >>>> know exactly how splintered to make the conversation. It probably >>>> belongs at python.org but if you want me to host it, I can. >>>> >>> >>> If too many things get moved off to SIGs there won't be anything left >>> for python-dev to talk about ;) >>> >> >> There is already an stdlib-sig, which has been almost unused. >> >> > > stdlib-sig isn't *quite* right (the testing and benchmarking are as much > about core python as the stdlib) - although we could view the benchmarks and > tests themselves as part of the standard library... > > Either way we should get it underway. Collin and Jeffrey - happy to use > stdlib-sig? Works for me. Collin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4