Collin Winter wrote: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Michael Foord > <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote: > >> Collin Winter wrote: >> >>> As part of the common standard library and test suite that we agreed >>> on at the PyCon language summit last week, we're going to include a >>> common benchmark suite that all Python implementations can share. This >>> is still some months off, though, so there'll be plenty of time to >>> bikeshed^Wrationally discuss which benchmarks should go in there. >>> >>> >> Where is the right place for us to discuss this common benchmark and test >> suite? >> >> As the benchmark is developed I would like to ensure it can run on >> IronPython. >> >> The test suite changes will need some discussion as well - Jython and >> IronPython (and probably PyPy) have almost identical changes to tests that >> currently rely on deterministic finalisation (reference counting) so it >> makes sense to test changes on both platforms and commit a single solution. >> > > I believe Brett Cannon is the best person to talk to about this kind > of thing. I don't know that any common mailing list has been set up, > though there may be and Brett just hasn't told anyone yet :) > > Collin > Which begs the question of whether we *should* have a separate mailing list. I don't think we discussed this specific point in the language summit - although it makes sense. Should we have a list specifically for the test / benchmarking or would a more general implementations-sig be appropriate? And is it really Brett who sets up mailing lists? My understanding is that he is pulling out of stuff for a while anyway, so that he can do Java / Phd type things... ;-) Michael -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4