Ronald Oussoren wrote: > > On 1 Apr, 2009, at 8:45, Peck, Jon wrote: > >> Apparently the Mac Python 2.6.1 Installer image does not include >> 64-bit binaries. Is this going to change? Is there some technical >> reason why these are not included? We are hoping to support that in >> our next 64-bit release. > > The 2.6 installer image does not include 64-bit binaries. As of this > week the script that creates the installer can build an installer that > does support 64-bit code as well, but that only works on Leopard systems. > > I'm thinking about how to distribute binaries that support 64-bit code > without unduly complicating the world. The easiest option for me would > be to have two installers: one 32-bit only that supports OSX 10.3.9 > and later and a 4-way universal one that supports OSX Leopard and > later. It might be possible to have a single installer that supports > 64-bit code on Leopard but is usable on 10.3.9 as well, but I haven't > checked yet how much that would complicate the build. > Two installers sounds OK to me, particularly if it simplifies the build process but allows us to still support 64bit. Michael > Ronald > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk > -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4