On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote: > Adam Olsen writes: > > > [1] You could argue that Unicode should add new scalars to handle all > > currently invalid UTF-8 sequences. > > AFAIK there are about 2^31 of these, though! They've promised to never allocate above U+10FFFF (0 to 1114111). Not sure that makes new additions easier or harder. ;) -- Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4