Nick Coghlan wrote: > Benjamin Peterson wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 2:12 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: [...] >>> In addition, some documentation set should show up at >>> >>> http://docs.python.org/ >>> >>> Not sure whether this should be 2.6 or 3.0. >> Almost certainly 2.6. > > Definitely 2.6 - 2.x is still going to be the "mainstream" Python > version for a good while yet. > > Although it may be worth tweaking the main index page for the 2.6 docs > to include a cross-link to the 3.0 docs. > Indeed. Having spent efforts to persuade the community that 3.0 isn't intended to replace 2.6 for production use it would be a shame to have docs.python.org counteract that. regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4