> Good sleuthing. Since you have found an inconsistency, now all the > docs are useless? LOL! Hardly! I only found one inconsistent page, and it happens to be one that I found a little hard to understand while I was learning the language. In ALGOL it is used as part of the statement, like: FOR I := 1, 5 STEP 2 UNTIL 9, 12 WHILE (X < 5) DO ... So I'm quite happy with it being an expression separator. I would re-write that part of the grammar to have a tuple_display like list_display, but it's not worth the effort. > But it is not -- it is the message passed to the exception constructor! I apologize, oversimplified the statement. I wanted to express that it's not just passed as a parameter to the exception constructor, but the fact that the exception that that is constructed is also raised in some circumstances. I didn't mean to imply that the expression itself was raised. IMHO, the keyword "else" wasn't strong enough. Joel
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4