Nick Coghlan wrote: > While it may not make sense to list it in the table itself, having a > note on that page that comma is NOT an operator (unlike C), and hence > only permitted between expressions as part of another statement or > expressions that permits it may not be a bad idea. better include "=" and augmented assignments as well. on the other hand, we're talking about a single instance of a "someone" here -- it's not like there's any sign that the comma issue is something that lots of someones are confused about. (...and given that the precedence table has been broken for over a decade (see http://bugs.python.org/issue3558) due to a bug in the Latex-to-HTML renderer, one might wonder if anyone gets that far into the language reference at all...) </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4