Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Even if it isn't a keyword, the compiler could still special-case it, > and add a run-time check to determine whether assert is still bound to > the built-in assert. Then we would have something that looks exactly like an ordinary function call but actually isn't. I'm not sure that's a good idea. Also there are issues such as what happens if you shadow it. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4