-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 12, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> > wrote: > >> We had a lot of discussion recently about changing the release >> schedule and >> splitting Python 2.6 and 3.0. There was general consensus that >> this was a >> good idea, in order to hit our October 1 deadline for Python 2.6 >> final at >> least. > > Does it matter to anyone besides the you, the Python developers, > whether the schedule slips by two weeks, or two months, for that > matter? For Python 3.0? No. > I am underwhelmed by 3.0 b3: sax and 2to3 are/were broken. A b4 > release for 3.0 (at least) would seem more prudent. We will release no Python before its time. - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSMpsr3EjvBPtnXfVAQKCUQP/WYfGeubbkWjmwI9mlQ4dMbVjGk15imAJ ArIBs4sH9tbZTE12uNhjNgvXRbN+1QfejNeWOEJEAnPdErPAT0TKAmgA2Rj1MmjP ook5+MbxkgkNnKbz8lozMPduclc7Djf22CYboAqiskK7G6LfD1fsCrIMEVSku/HX dQpXGkG/C4g= =FYgJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4