Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-September/082308.html below:

[Python-Dev] constness of interpreter data

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] constness of interpreter data
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Things to Know About Super
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> So, er, is this a remotely sane thing to be doing, and does anyone have
> suggestions? :)

Not for 2.6/3.0 - but after that: sounds good.

OTOH, I don't see a clear technical *need* for these data to be const.
In general, const-ness helps correctness and sharing across processes,
and the cases you provide are correct and provide sharing even without
being const.

Regards,
Martin

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] constness of interpreter data
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Things to Know About Super
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4