> FWIW, my opinion is similar to how I read Martin's - that if a suitable, > safe patch that cleanly uninstalls can be found, it should be included, but > disabled by default. Personally I'd never use it. That's my view also (less strict now; I previously would have rejected it outright, as I didn't consider that it might be optional and off by default). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4