Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Why not expose the class directly, instead of > making it private and then exposing it via a factory function that does > nothing else? This option would also have the advantage of not changing the API (unless there's code out there that actually depends on them *not* being classes, and that seems rather unlikely). -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4