RetroSearch Browse

Mon Sep 1 23:25:24 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-September/082127.html

Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 
>> Does anybody ever complain about not being able to use isinstance on
>> twisted.application.Application? (At least it's documented as a
>> function there.)
> 
> the threading "non-classes" are documented to be factory functions on
> the module page.

Given the proximity of RC1, Antoine's option 3 (leaving the capitalised
factory functions in both multiprocessing and threading APIs) is
actually sounding pretty appealing to me at the moment.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
            http://www.boredomandlaziness.org

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-September/082127.html below:

[Python-Dev] Further PEP 8 compliance issues in threading and multiprocessing