Barry Warsaw wrote: > or even decided that we're moving to one. Brett as the head of the > infrastructure committee will have more to say about that. While it is indeed the infrastructure committee's call (since they'll shoulder the bulk of the effort in organising further investigation into the idea), I personally believe that moving to some kind of DVCS makes too much sense for it not to happen eventually. Anything we can do to make it easier to maintain 4 active branches (2.x-1 and 3.y-1 maintenance, 2.x and 3.y development) over the next few years is going to be worth a fair amount of up front effort. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4