RetroSearch Browse

Thu Oct 23 04:24:32 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-October/083087.html

In version of Python prior to 2.5, it would appear that deepcopying
compiled regular expressions worked by accident:

2.4:

    >>> copy.deepcopy(re.compile(''))
    <_sre.SRE_Pattern object at 0xb7d53ef0>

2.5:

    >>> copy.deepcopy(re.compile(''))
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
      File "/usr/lib/python2.5/copy.py", line 173, in deepcopy
        y = copier(memo)
    TypeError: cannot deepcopy this pattern object

I say "by accident", since the SRE_Pattern object in 2.4 has
a __deepcopy__ method which raises the "cannot deepcopy this pattern
object" TypeError, however this method isn't found by copy.deepcopy()
in 2.4, and copy.deepcopy() falls back to using the pickle logic.

The _sre source has #ifdef-out support for __deepcopy__, issue 416670
has the gory details:

    http://bugs.python.org/issue416670

Changeset 38430 on the release24-maint branch introduced the changes
that stopped SRE_Pattern.__deepcopy__ being found. r38430 was a patch
forward ported from 2.3, but never ported to the trunk (probably a good
thing, too).

Thoughts?

-- 
Andrew McNamara, Senior Developer, Object Craft
http://www.object-craft.com.au/

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-October/083087.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python2.5 _sre deepcopy regression?