RetroSearch Browse

Wed Oct 22 16:37:29 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-October/083071.html

Ooops, you are right.
Silly error on my part.
Still, my comment about heapq still stands,

and
[hack, slash]

0.39713821814841893   (old)
0.35184029691278162   (hakced, for special list treatment)

So, there is a 12% performance boost to be had by specializing for lists.
How about it?

K

> -----Original Message-----
> From: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames.com at python.org
> [mailto:python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames.com at python.org] On Behalf
> Of Antoine Pitrou
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 14:06
> To: python-dev at python.org
> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] heapq, min and max
>

> This is clearly wrong. l.sort() will sort the list in place when it is
> first
> invoked, and therefore will be very fast in subsequent calls.
>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-October/083071.html below:

[Python-Dev] heapq, min and max