On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 00:56, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > I think 2.7 should continue along the path of convergence toward 3.x. The > vision some of us talked about at Pycon was that at some point down the > line, maybe there's no difference between "python2.9 -3" and "python3.3 -2". I like that. Do we know what the next "hurdle" would be? The testing I have done seems to indicate that one major area is handling of binary file data that may or may not be binary. Is a real bytes type (and not just an alternate spelling for str) a possibility? It may be that this isn't a problem in practice, I don't know yet. :) -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4