Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-October/082991.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r66863 - python/trunk/Modules/posixmodule.c

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r66863 - python/trunk/Modules/posixmodule.c
• Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r66863 - python/trunk/Modules/posixmodule.c
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If they do fail, they're not "false" positives.  If they're "false",
> then the test is broken, no?

Correct. But they might well be broken, no?

> So find a way to label them as tests
> added ex-post, with the failures *not* being regressions but rather
> latent bugs newly detected, and (presumably) as "wont-fix".

No such way exists, hence they can't be labeled that way.
No such labeling can be added, since that would be a new feature.

Regards,
Martin

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r66863 - python/trunk/Modules/posixmodule.c
• Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r66863 - python/trunk/Modules/posixmodule.c
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4