On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:53:01PM -0700, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > The 2.6/3.0 development process was so disruptive that I doubt > that 2.5 received adequate attention for bug fixes. Why not wait > two or three months for the dust to settle? Can you please clarify your meaning? Do you mean that * we haven't been backporting fixes to 2.5? * we should wait to see if any horrible problems are reported in 2.6? * we need to look at the logs for commits that should be applied to 2.5? --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4