> The 2.6/3.0 development process was so disruptive that I doubt > that 2.5 received adequate attention for bug fixes. Why not wait > two or three months for the dust to settle? Would it receive more attention in the next three months? Who specifically would give it that attention? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4