On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:59 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: >> Setuptools declares dependencies, but does not add a Python version requirement, >> like what was proposed in PEP 345 (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0345/) >> with a new metadata called 'Requires Python' >> >> Even if the problem is fixed in short term with a Trove classifier, > > Why would that be a short-term fix? It would work for the entire life > time of Python 3, and can be easily extended for Python 4, so it sounds > like a permanent solution to me. > > As a permanent solution, you need to keep the problem statement in mind, > though: to allow people to determine whether a package works with Python 3. > >> the metadata of a package should provide this information imho. > > Well, the classifiers *are* part of the metadata of the package. Yes and they are redundant to other metadata, like the licence for instance.. So maybe the problem is the other way: some specific metadata should be removed since they are expressed in the classifier medatata. (e.g. only in one place) There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it. Regards Tarek
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4