RetroSearch Browse

Fri Oct 3 02:40:20 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-October/082811.html

    >>>> shouldn't we use a suitable gcc option for the buildbots to prevent
    >>>> that from happening?
    >>> 
    >>> Which one specifically?
    >> 
    >> I suggest we add "-std=c89" to CFLAGS.

    Martin> That needs thorough testing, in particular across many old Linux
    Martin> distributions. It might be that some sets of Linux header files
    Martin> rely on GNU C extensions, without using the __extension__
    Martin> keyword.

Surely we don't need to be that careful with the buildbots do we?  If
anything, I think it would be a good idea to be more strict for them than
the default.

Skip

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-October/082811.html below:

[Python-Dev] c99 comments in the 2.6 code base?