RetroSearch Browse

Wed Oct 1 23:39:42 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-October/082749.html

Bill Janssen wrote:
> Perhaps PEP 355 just went too far.

That was certainly one of the major objections to it. A filesystem path
object which didn't try to combine a half-dozen different modules into
methods on a single object, but instead focused on solving a few
specific problems with using raw strings as file paths would have a far
greater chance of acceptance.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
            http://www.boredomandlaziness.org

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-October/082749.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-3000] New proposition for Python3 bytes filename issue