RetroSearch Browse

Sun Nov 30 23:06:58 CET 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-November/083795.html

> > [Hrm - looking closer at that HTML link I sent before, it says
> > specifically "Per-machine installs must install to Program Files 
> > by default in order to
> > pass this test case" - that seems pretty clear...]
> 
> Given that the links in Gerald's examples were under Program Files, I
> had assumed that HP were tweaking the installer at least that much...

But wouldn't that leave us in the situation where Python's installer is
*not* "OEM Ready", nor has it been certified as such - but an installer
based on ours, but with unspecified changes has?

Of course, I don't object to that and still think we should help where we
can, but if that is true it would make the premise of this thread a little
misleading, as obviously HP could then make *any* necessary changes without
our agreement or even knowledge.

Cheers,

Mark

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-November/083795.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python for windows.