Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote: > Hello there. > > I recently created this issue: http://bugs.python.org/issue4336 3 days ago. > I‘ve had no response so far. Possible reasons: no automatic assignee; core developers focused on getting 2.5.3, 2.6.1, and 3.0.0 out in the next few weeks; some people (me, at least) use Friday new issues list for issue review. > This patch solved a serious performance > problem with simple xmlrpc queries for us. > > Any interest or thoughts? > > I am only slightly uncomfortable with changing the buffersize. I > notice that socket._fileobject.read() Disallows small recv() calls for performance > reasons and forces buffer to at least 8k. But > readline() does no such things and becomes very inefficient for the > unbuffered case. Maybe it would be better just to fix socket._fileobject > to have _rbufsize be always at lest 8k You might want to add these thoughts to the issue too.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4