> From my point of view bi-monthly release are too much. For a ?.?.1 > release two months are fine because several issues are found by 3rd > party authors. But after that a release every quarter is sufficient. > > * .1 release two months after the .0 release > * .2, .3, .4 and .5 release every quarter > * about here the next minor release gets out > * .6 and further releases after 6 months when necessary In the past, we had been striving for releases every 6 month. This was already very difficult to achieve. While I'm happy that Barry has automated his part to a high degree, my part is, unfortunately, much less automated. I could personally automate the build process a bit more, but part of it is also testing of the installers, which is manual. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4