On Wed, Nov 12, 2008, Mark Dickinson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: >> >> As for numbits, I think it should be a method, because while it's >> very fast for the current implementation of longs, it could be longer >> to calculate for a long implementation using something other than a >> power-of-2 base. > > Right: numbits is only a natural property of a *binary* integer. > > On the other hand, I can't realistically see Python ever adopting a > non power-of-two based implementation. What do you call Decimal? ;-) -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code." --Bill Harlan
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4